■ BMI vs PG: dividend comparison 2026
| Metric | BMI | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $135.47 | $145.12 |
| TTM Yield | 1.21% | 2.96% |
| Forward Yield | 1.30% | 3.00% |
| TTM Dividend / share | $1.6400 | $4.2920 |
| Payment frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last payment | $0.4400 | $1.0890 |
| 3-yr dividend CAGR | 20.3% | 5.0% |
| 5-yr dividend CAGR | 16.2% | 6.0% |
| 10-yr dividend CAGR | 14.3% | 4.7% |
| Growth streak | 21 years | 22 years |
| Payments on record | 147 | 259 |
| Paying since | 1990 | 1962 |
| Tools | Calculator · History | Calculator · History |
Green cells mark the better value where higher is objectively better (yield, growth, streak). Live data, refreshed daily.
How to read this matchup
Income today vs income tomorrow. A higher trailing yield pays more now; a higher dividend CAGR compounds into more income later. Ten years of 16.2% annual growth roughly doubles the payout per share.
Frequency matters for compounding. BMI pays quarterly and PG pays quarterly. More frequent payments reinvest sooner, which helps DRIP slightly, and smooth out cash flow for anyone living off the income.
Model both in the calculator with your own numbers: BMI dividend calculator and PG dividend calculator.
FAQ
Which has the higher yield, BMI or PG?
PG currently has the higher trailing yield: 2.96% for PG versus 1.21% for BMI. Yield alone is not the whole story: check growth rates and payment consistency below.
Which dividend grows faster, BMI or PG?
BMI has grown its payout faster over the past 5 years: 16.2% versus 6.0% compound annual growth.
Can I hold both BMI and PG?
Yes, and many income investors do. A common approach pairs a higher-yield position for current income with a higher-growth position for future income. Check the overlap of their strategies before doubling up on the same exposure.